2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (305 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda CX-9 | 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Mazda | Jeep |
| Model | CX-9 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3963 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
