2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan AA-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan AA-X would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 69 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Nissan AA-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1995 Nissan AA-X has manual transmission. 1995 Nissan AA-X will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda CX-9 | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | CX-9 | AA-X |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3725 cc | 1273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2530 mm |
