2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2000 Peugeot 406
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Peugeot 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Peugeot 406 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2000 Peugeot 406. (134 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2000 Peugeot 406.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Peugeot 406. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Peugeot 406.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-9 | 2000 Peugeot 406 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | CX-9 | 406 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2730 mm |