2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2000 Toyota Caserta
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Caserta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Caserta would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Caserta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 244 kg more than 2000 Toyota Caserta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Toyota Caserta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (140 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda CX-9 | 2000 Toyota Caserta | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | CX-9 | Caserta |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 370 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 936 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 55 L |
