2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2010 BMW 750
To start off, 2010 BMW 750 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 750 (400 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2008 Mazda CX-9. (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 750 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2010 BMW 750 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW 750 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 750 (609 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-9 | 2010 BMW 750 | |
Make | Mazda | BMW |
Model | CX-9 | 750 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 609 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3071 mm |