2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2008 Mazda CX-9. (270 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-9 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | CX-9 | Calais |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3725 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 370 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |