2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (271 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2011 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi TT.
Because 2011 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-9 | 2011 Audi TT | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | CX-9 | TT |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |