2008 Mazda DrifterX vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2008 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda DrifterX weights approximately 615 kg more than 1982 Renault 9.
Because 2008 Mazda DrifterX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda DrifterX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 9. (104 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 9.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda DrifterX | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | DrifterX | 9 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 257 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.6:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2490 mm |