2008 Mazda DrifterX vs. 2006 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2008 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan 350Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan 350Z would be higher. At 3,491 cc, 2006 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda DrifterX weights approximately 5 kg more than 2006 Nissan 350Z.
Because 2008 Mazda DrifterX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Nissan 350Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda DrifterX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan 350Z (354 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda DrifterX. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda DrifterX | 2006 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | DrifterX | 350Z |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3491 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 257 Nm | 354 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.5 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 76 L |