2008 Mazda DrifterX vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2008 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Suzuki Reno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Suzuki Reno would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda DrifterX weights approximately 515 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Because 2008 Mazda DrifterX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Suzuki Reno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda DrifterX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Reno. (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda DrifterX | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | DrifterX | Reno |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
Torque | 257 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.5 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |