2008 Mazda DrifterX vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda DrifterX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda DrifterX would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda DrifterX. (257 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda DrifterX | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | DrifterX | UTE |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
