2008 Mazda DrifterX vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda DrifterX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda DrifterX would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Mazda DrifterX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda DrifterX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda DrifterX | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | DrifterX | Epica |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 257 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |