2008 Mazda Etude vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 145 weights approximately 226 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1968 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Volvo 145 (153 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Volvo 145 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda Etude | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Etude | 145 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1778 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 84.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1064 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |
