2008 Mazda Etude vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 101 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1982 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Etude | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Etude | Celica |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1986 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 115 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 75 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1064 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2620 mm |