2008 Mazda Etude vs. 1996 Tata E220
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Tata E220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Tata E220 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Tata E220 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Tata E220 weights approximately 306 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1996 Tata E220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Tata E220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Tata E220 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Tata E220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda Etude | 1996 Tata E220 | |
| Make | Mazda | Tata |
| Model | Etude | E220 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2197 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1064 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2810 mm |
