2008 Mazda Etude vs. 1997 Mercury MC4
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury MC4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury MC4 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Mercury MC4 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Mercury MC4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mercury MC4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercury MC4 (387 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1997 Mercury MC4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude. 1997 Mercury MC4 has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda Etude has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda Etude will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mercury MC4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda Etude | 1997 Mercury MC4 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercury |
| Model | Etude | MC4 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 4601 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 387 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 186 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
