2008 Mazda Etude vs. 2004 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 1,839 cc, 2008 Mazda Etude is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda Etude weights approximately 307 kg more than 2004 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2004 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda Etude (164 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda Etude will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Etude | 2004 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Mazda | Smart |
Model | Etude | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1839 cc | 799 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 130 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.7 seconds | 19.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1112 kg | 805 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 3.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 22 L |