2008 Mazda Etude vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 568 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo C70 (339 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (163 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Etude | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Etude | C70 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1839 cc | 2319 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.7 seconds | 7.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1093 kg | 1661 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |