2008 Mazda Etude vs. 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda Etude. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda Etude would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR weights approximately 187 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 897 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (163 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Etude | 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Mazda | Koenigsegg |
Model | Etude | CCXR |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1839 cc | 4719 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 1064 HP |
Torque | 163 Nm | 1060 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.8:1 |
Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 400 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.7 seconds | 2.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1093 kg | 1280 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 22 L/100km |