2008 Mazda Etude vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda Etude. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda Etude would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (142 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda Etude has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda Etude will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda Etude | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | Etude | Epica |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1991 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
