2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata vs. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Daewoo Tocsa would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata (166 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata should accelerate faster than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa (237 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata. (190 Nm). This means 2007 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata | 2007 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Mazda | Daewoo |
Model | MX-5 Miata | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |