2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 1962 Rover P5
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Rover P5 weights approximately 770 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1962 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Rover P5 (218 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1962 Rover P5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda Rustler | 1962 Rover P5 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | Rustler | P5 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2995 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2650 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 105 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1720 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |
