2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 weights approximately 435 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 (142 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Rustler | 1965 Mercedes-Benz W 110 | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Rustler | W 110 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1895 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1385 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 52 L |