2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 1973 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Datsun 240Z weights approximately 54 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1973 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1973 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda Rustler | 1973 Datsun 240Z | |
| Make | Mazda | Datsun |
| Model | Rustler | 240Z |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2393 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 151 HP |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.6 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1014 kg | 1068 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
