2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 1989 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Celica weights approximately 506 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1989 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda Rustler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Toyota Celica (275 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1989 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Rustler | 1989 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Rustler | Celica |
Year Released | 2008 | 1989 |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1996 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 275 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 230 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.6 seconds | 7.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1014 kg | 1520 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |