2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,323 cc, 2008 Mazda Rustler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda Rustler weights approximately 160 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart.
Because 2002 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Smart (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Rustler | 2002 MCC Smart | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | Rustler | Smart |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 698 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 67 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 790 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 35 L |