2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,586 cc, 2008 Mazda Rustler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda Rustler weights approximately 194 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2003 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda Rustler (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (112 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda Rustler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Rustler | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | Rustler | Smart |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 698 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1014 kg | 820 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2370 mm |