2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 834 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (460 Nm) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Rustler | 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Rustler | SL |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 4966 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 460 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1014 kg | 1848 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |