2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,832 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Celica weights approximately 190 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Celica (170 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Rustler | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Rustler | Celica |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1832 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 91.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1140 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |