2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2005 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota RAV4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota RAV4 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota RAV4 weights approximately 401 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 2005 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda Rustler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota RAV4 (224 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota RAV4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Rustler | 2005 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Rustler | RAV4 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2359 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 224 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1014 kg | 1415 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 56 L |