2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda Rustler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda Rustler would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler. 2009 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda Rustler has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda Rustler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Rustler | 2009 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | Rustler | Outlook |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3564 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 277 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 11.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |