2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda Rustler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda Rustler would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 316 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Matrix (174 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda Rustler | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Rustler | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1798 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 132 HP |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1014 kg | 1330 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |
