2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda Rustler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda Rustler would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler. 2010 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda Rustler has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda Rustler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda Rustler | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | Rustler | TT |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1800 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |
