2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2010 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2010 Nissan Micra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda Rustler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda Rustler would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Micra weights approximately 40 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Micra (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda Rustler | 2010 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Rustler | Micra |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1461 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 88 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 990 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 46 L |
