2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2011 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda Rustler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda Rustler would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 247 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Rustler | 2011 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | Rustler | Captiva |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2405 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 135 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1014 kg | 1261 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |