2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2011 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda Rustler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda Rustler would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 663 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Impala (293 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler. 2011 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda Rustler has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda Rustler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Rustler | 2011 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | Rustler | Impala |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 3500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 211 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 293 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1613 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 64 L |