2008 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 0 more horse power than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda RX-8 | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Mazda | Talbot |
Model | RX-8 | Baby |
Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3130 mm |