2008 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Rover 414i is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 414i weights approximately 38 kg more than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2008 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda RX-8 | 1997 Rover 414i | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | RX-8 | 414i |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Top Speed | 223 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1460 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2780 mm |
