2008 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1999 Holden Nova
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1999 Holden Nova. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1999 Holden Nova.
Because 2008 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda RX-8 | 1999 Holden Nova | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-8 | Nova |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2470 mm |
