2008 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 2008 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8. 2008 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 2005 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2005 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda RX-8 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-8 | Clio |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.8:1 |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 110 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 48 L |