2008 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2007 Proton Gen
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Proton Gen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Proton Gen would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Proton Gen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Proton Gen (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Proton Gen should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2008 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Proton Gen, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Proton Gen (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2007 Proton Gen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda RX-8 | 2007 Proton Gen | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | RX-8 | Gen |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 110 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |