2008 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2010 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2010 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2008 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (299 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2010 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda RX-8 | 2010 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Mazda | Saab |
Model | RX-8 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 299 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2675 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 62 L |