2008 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda RX-8 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | RX-8 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 93 L |