2008 Mazda Tribute vs. 1963 Volvo 120
To start off, 2008 Mazda Tribute is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda Tribute (153 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1963 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1963 Volvo 120.
Because 1963 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda Tribute (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda Tribute | 1963 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Tribute | 120 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 201 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2070 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |
