2008 Mercedes-Benz A vs. 1995 Rover 800
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 800 would be higher. At 2,675 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Rover 800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 800 weights approximately 284 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz A.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 800 (225 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercedes-Benz A. (155 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercedes-Benz A.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz A | 1995 Rover 800 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | A | 800 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1699 cc | 2675 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 155 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |