2008 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1963 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1963 Steyr Haflinger.
Because 1963 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C (511 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 470 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. 2008 Mercedes-Benz C has automatic transmission and 1963 Steyr Haflinger has manual transmission. 1963 Steyr Haflinger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercedes-Benz C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz C | 1963 Steyr Haflinger | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Steyr |
Model | C | Haflinger |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 643 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
Torque | 511 Nm | 41 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 2840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 1510 mm |