2008 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,398 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C (225 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz C | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | C | FTO |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2398 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 225 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |