2008 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 44 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK (500 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz C | 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | C | SLK |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 5439 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 361 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 500 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 97.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.2 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1541 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |