2008 Mercedes-Benz CL vs. 1986 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 5,461 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL (383 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 294 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CL | 1986 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | CL | Tempo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5461 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 383 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2540 mm |