2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1949 Riley RM A
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 6,208 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 640 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1949 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1949 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1949 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
Model | CLK | RM A |
Year Released | 2008 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 6208 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 474 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2870 mm |